Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Don't mind that sobbing coming from the corner. It's just my soul.

The story linked above:

Advocates Push for Simplified Spelling
Wednesday, July 05, 2006

WASHINGTON — When "say," "they" and "weigh" rhyme, but "bomb," "comb" and "tomb" don't, wuudn't it maek mor sens to spel wurdz the wae thae sound?

Those in favor of simplified spelling say children would learn faster and illiteracy rates would drop. Opponents say a new system would make spelling even more confusing.

Eether wae, the consept has yet to capcher th publix imajinaeshun.

It's been 100 years since Andrew Carnegie helped create the Simplified Spelling Board to promote a retooling of written English and President Theodore Roosevelt tried to force the government to use simplified spelling in its publications. But advocates aren't giving up.

They even picket the national spelling bee finals, held every year in Washington, costumed as bumble bees and hoisting signs that say "Enuf is enuf but enough is too much" or "I'm thru with through."

Thae sae th bee selebraets th ability of a fue stoodents to master a dificult sistem that stumps meny utherz hoo cuud do just as wel if speling were simpler.

"It's a very difficult thing to get something accepted like this," acknowledges Alan Mole, president of the American Literacy Council, which favors an end to "illogical spelling." The group says English has 42 sounds spelled in a bewildering 400 ways.

Americans doen't aulwaez go for whut's eezy — witnes th faeluer of th metric sistem to cach on. But propoenents of simpler speling noet that a smatering of aulterd spelingz hav maed th leep into evrydae ues.

Doughnut also is donut; colour, honour and labour long ago lost the British "u" and the similarly derived theatre and centre have been replaced by the easier-to-sound-out theater and center.

"The kinds of progress that we're seeing are that someone will spell night 'nite' and someone will spell through 'thru,'" Mole said. "We try to show where these spellings are used and to show dictionary makers that they are used so they will include them as alternate spellings."

Lurning English reqierz roet memory rather than lojic, he sed.

In languages with phonetically spelled words, like German or Spanish, children learn to spell in weeks instead of months or years as is sometimes the case with English, Mole said.

But education professor Donald Bear said to simplify spelling would probably make it more difficult because words get meaning from their prefixes, suffixes and roots.

"Students come to understand how meaning is preserved in the way words are spelled," said Bear, director of the E.L. Cord Foundation Center for Learning and Literacy at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Th cuntry's larjest teecherz uennyon, wuns a suporter, aulso objects.

Michael Marks, a member of the National Education Association's executive committee, said learning would be disrupted if children had to switch to a different spelling system. "It may be more trouble than it's worth," said Marks, a debate and theater teacher at Hattiesburg High School in Mississippi.

E-mail and text messages are exerting a similar tug on the language, sharing some elements with the simplified spelling movement while differing in other ways. Electronic communications stress shortcuts like "u" more than phonetics. Simplified spelling is not always shorter than regular spelling — sistem instead of system, hoep instead of hope.

Carnegie tried to moov thingz along in 1906 when he helpt establish and fund th speling bord. He aulso uezd simplified speling in his correspondens, and askt enywun hoo reported to him to do the saem.

A filanthropist, he becaem pashunet about th ishoo after speeking with Melvil Dewey, a speling reform activist and Dewey Desimal sistem inventor hoo simplified his furst naem bi droping "le" frum Melville.

Roosevelt tried to get the government to adopt simpler spellings for 300 words but Congress blocked him. He used simple spellings in all White House memos, pressing forward his effort to "make our spelling a little less foolish and fantastic."

The Chicago Tribune aulso got into th act, uezing simpler spelingz in th nuezpaeper for about 40 years, ending in 1975. Plae-riet George Bernard Shaw, hoo roet moest of his mateerial in shorthand, left muny in his wil for th development of a nue English alfabet.

Carnegie, Dewey, Roosevelt and Shaw's work followed attempts by Benjamin Franklin, Daniel Webster and Mark Twain to advance simpler spelling. Twain lobbied The Associated Press at its 1906 annual meeting to "adopt and use our simplified forms and spread them to the ends of the earth." AP declined.

But for aul th hi-proefiel and skolarly eforts, the iedeea of funy-luuking but simpler spelingz didn't captivaet the masez then — or now.

"I think that the average person simply did not see this as a needed change or a necessary change or something that was ... going to change their lives for the better," said Marilyn Cocchiola Holt, manager of the Pennsylvania department of the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh.

Carnegie, hoo embraest teknolojy, died in in 1919, wel befor sel foenz went maenstreem. Had he livd, he probably wuud hav bin pleezd to no that milyonz of peepl send text and instant mesejez evry dae uezing thair oen formz of simplified speling: "Hav a gr8 day!"


First of all, the idiotic attempt at humor with the purposely misspelled sections grates, not only because it's stupid but because it encourages readers to see this idea as a harmless joke instead of something that should alarm them.

Second, I'm alarmed. I've been in the racket a long time, and this story exemplifies an all too common approach to education problems: If too many students are unsuccessful? Redefine success. It is shameful. Do we really want to combat illiteracy by legitimizing it? Throw up our hands and allow all written documents to devolve into chat room transcriptions? Because spelling is too hard?

I have a Ph.D. in English and I NEVER write without a dictionary on hand. Sometimes I'm not sure how to spell things. I look them up. How is that hard? I honestly don't understand.

You know how you learn to spell, in any language? You read. You don't need spelling drills or expensive software programs or flash cards. You READ. I know it can be tricky sometimes. SO WHAT?

9 Comments:

At 4:25 PM, Blogger gad said...

Preach it, sister.

gad

 
At 6:06 PM, Blogger Tense Teacher said...

Oh, Shell, there is so much I want to say about this, but I will only end up ranting, and my therapist tells me I need to find the real source of my anger instead of always "going off." *snort*

Every year I find it more and more difficult to battle text speak in my classroom. Seeing "w/o" for without, "tuff" for tough, "+" for and... It makes me see red. Please tell me that you don't have this problem at the college level.

 
At 8:39 AM, Blogger CrankyProf said...

You can't see it, but I am flopping around on the floor, having had an aneurysm.

Sadly enough, TT, I DO get college-level papers with some of the spelling errors these jackasses want to make legit.

 
At 4:26 PM, Anonymous Contrary said...

I honestly couldn't even make it all the way through (not thru) the story because of the author breaking into that simplified spelling crap.

I won't even let my kids use chat shorthand in instant messages or e-mails. Because it makes the person doing it look stupid and/or undereducated.

Argh.

 
At 10:27 AM, Blogger Shell said...

I've taught both high school and college and there's really not much difference, not when you're talking about undergraduates anyway.

I get so weary of fighting the same battles, circling the same mistakes, writing the same comments, all the while knowing most of them will go un-read. I'm not sure you can teach someone who doesn't read to write, and too many of our students don't read anything but email.

Ugh. I think I'll go back to bed.

 
At 10:40 AM, Blogger CrankyProf said...

Of course, the conspiracist in me feels the need to point out that an illiterate and ignorant population is a Hell of a lot easier to influence and control.

How nice. We can witness the advance guard of the new Dark Ages.

 
At 4:25 AM, Blogger Mr. Fabulous said...

Ooh, there is merit to what Carnky Prof says. So perhaps if the population dumbs down some, it will be easier for me to recruit minions. I would like to have a lot of minions.

 
At 2:42 PM, Blogger NuggetMaven said...

Oh shit... ebonics and hook'd on phonix are joining forces and are about to do a literary smackdown on American English...

OY LAZINESS! That's what it boils down to... old fashioned laziness.

 
At 4:25 PM, Blogger Geek said...

I was taught by the hook'd on phonix method. I have to look up words all the time, that or have Tense proof my spelling.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Number of online users in last 3 minutes